Sidewalks are for pedestrian and yet most cities make it hard for the inexperienced riders to ride in the streets. In Kettering most of the road ways are great for just riding around and if you commute you just can’t take the main streets without some unsafe riding. Some of my co workers that work with me in downtown Dayton will not commute to work because of what they experienced on the roads. One simply takes to the sidewalks on 48 and the other will not ride the streets because of what happened to his brother. It would be nice if some of the local cities would make their roads a tad bit wider or have some days that they close one lane to cars and let us cyclist ride to work or something.
Here is part of a letter byby Fred Oswald, PE, LCI #947 to a City Council Concerning Dangerous Bicycle Laws
§ 1173.11(a) says (in part): “No person under the age of fourteen (14) years shall operate a bicycle on the roadways within the city, provided sidewalks are available.“ In addition, 1173.11(c) says “No person under the age of fourteen (14) years shall ride a bicycle or motorized bicycle, upon any public or private property used by the public for the purpose of vehicular travel or parking.“
This ordinance is invalid pursuant to ORC § 4511.711. Furthermore, irrespective of its validity it is a bad idea. Bicycle safety studies, such as “Risk Factors for Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Collisions at Intersections” by Wachtel and Lewiston, Journal of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1994, show that the collision rate for sidewalk and sidepath bicycle operators is about twice the rate on the adjacent road. Other studies involving roads with higher intersection density and faster cyclists report a crash rate up to nine times as high.
Because of this danger, the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999) specifically warns: “Sidewalks are typically designed for pedestrian speeds and maneuverability and are not safe for higher speed bicycle use. ... At intersections, motorists are often not looking for bicyclists (who are traveling at higher speeds than pedestrians) entering the crosswalk area, particularly when motorists are making a turn. Sight distance is often impaired…“
A sidewalk ordinance declares that every sidewalk in the city is a bicycle facility. However, sidewalks are designed for pedestrians, not vehicular traffic such as bicycles. Many sidewalks have safety defects that can cause bicycle crashes, thus exposing the city to liability. Why is the residential street on which a 13 year old lives, unsafe for cycling, especially if her parents have taught proper methods? In a Palo Alto, California summer program, groups of eight year olds were taught to ride safely on residential streets, ten year olds on up to 4-lane streets with moderate traffic, and 12 year olds on any non-freeway streets. Indeed, well-informed parents can teach these skills earlier than a school group.
We must instead teach both adult and child cyclists to ride properly on the street, following the normal rules of the road. This is the only method that allows the bicycle to be used as a safe and practical transportation vehicle. Younger child cyclists should be kept off the street just as they should not be allowed to cross the streets until they understand how to do this safely. But this must be determined by the parents. Moreover, the parents must learn to operate bicycles correctly so they can instruct their children.
The full story: http://www.crankmail.com/Fred/sidewalk-laws-letter.html